Best Tools to Reduce Interview Costs

The right tools can cut interview costs by 30–60% while improving candidate quality and experience. Here's our curated guide to the best platforms in each category.

Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS)

The backbone of any hiring process. A modern ATS reduces admin cost, improves candidate experience, and provides the data to optimise costs over time.

Greenhouse

From $6,000/yr

4.7

Industry-standard ATS with excellent structured interview toolkits, scorecard management, and robust reporting. Strong candidate experience features.

Best for:Mid-market to enterprise, structured hiring
Cost saving:~$300/hire in admin time
Visit Greenhouse

Lever

From $3,500/yr

4.5

Combines ATS and CRM functionality. Strong pipeline analytics, two-way email sync, and solid Slack/calendar integrations. Good for companies building talent pipelines.

Best for:Growth-stage companies, 50–500 employees
Cost saving:~$250/hire in admin time
Visit Lever

Workable

From $189/mo

4.4

Affordable, easy to set up, with built-in job posting to 200+ boards. Good AI matching features. Less powerful for enterprise workflows.

Best for:SMBs and startups, 10–200 employees
Cost saving:~$180/hire in admin time
Visit Workable

Ashby

From $350/mo

4.8

The fastest-growing ATS in tech hiring. Outstanding analytics, combined ATS + CRM, and highly configurable workflows. Loved by engineering-first orgs.

Best for:Data-driven teams, 50–2,000 employees
Cost saving:~$400/hire in admin time
Visit Ashby

Async Video Screening

One-way video interviews replace live phone screens and cut screening costs by 50–65%. Candidates record at their convenience; recruiters review when ready.

Spark Hire

From $149/mo

4.6

Market leader in async video screening. Easy candidate experience, good ATS integrations, and solid analytics on completion rates and quality.

Best for:Mid-market, high-volume hiring
Cost saving:50–65% screening cost reduction
Visit Spark Hire

HireVue

From $35,000/yr

4.2

Enterprise-grade with AI scoring capabilities (use with caution re: bias). Scalable to very high volumes. Includes structured interview guides and analytics.

Best for:Enterprise, 1,000+ hires/yr
Cost saving:55–70% screening cost reduction
Visit HireVue

VidCruiter

From $100/mo

4.5

Strong structured interview workflows with rating guides built in. Better for companies that want consistency alongside the async video format.

Best for:Mid-market, structured interviews
Cost saving:45–60% screening cost reduction
Visit VidCruiter

Willo

From $79/mo

4.4

Simple, fast to implement, good candidate experience. Lacks some enterprise integrations but excellent value for smaller organisations.

Best for:SMBs and agencies
Cost saving:45–55% screening cost reduction
Visit Willo

Interview Scheduling Automation

Scheduling is the #1 source of coordinator cost. These tools let candidates self-schedule from real interviewer availability, saving 2–4 hours per hire.

GoodTime

From $800/mo

4.7

Purpose-built for recruiting teams. Smart interviewer selection based on past performance data, automatic load balancing, and ATS-native integrations with Greenhouse and Lever.

Best for:High-volume tech hiring teams
Cost saving:60–80% scheduling time saved
Visit GoodTime

Cronofy

From $250/mo

4.5

Calendar API-first platform that integrates deeply with existing ATS workflows. Best for tech-forward teams with developer resources to customise.

Best for:Teams needing calendar API flexibility
Cost saving:55–75% scheduling time saved
Visit Cronofy

Calendly

From $10/seat/mo

4.6

The easiest to set up. Not recruiting-specific but widely used for phone screens and first-round interviews. Lacks ATS integration depth of purpose-built tools.

Best for:SMBs and early-stage startups
Cost saving:40–60% scheduling time saved
Visit Calendly

Prelude (by Calendly)

Custom pricing

4.5

Originally standalone, now part of Calendly. Strong interviewer-matching and scheduling automation purpose-built for recruiting workflows.

Best for:Mid-market structured hiring
Cost saving:65–80% scheduling time saved
Visit Prelude (by Calendly)

Skills Assessment Platforms

Front-loading assessments before live interviews filters out unsuitable candidates early, reducing the number reaching expensive panel stages by 30–50%.

HackerRank

From $25/assessment

4.4

Largest library of technical assessments. Real-code environments, automated scoring, and good ATS integrations. Industry standard for engineering roles.

Best for:Technical / software engineering roles
Cost saving:30–45% reduction in live technical interviews
Visit HackerRank

Codility

From $4,000/yr

4.3

Focused on objective technical assessment. Strong anti-cheating features and good analytics. Used by many large tech companies for coding screens.

Best for:Engineering teams hiring at scale
Cost saving:35–50% reduction in live technical screens
Visit Codility

TestGorilla

From $75/mo

4.4

Wide library covering cognitive ability, personality, job-specific skills, and language tests. Excellent value for SMBs. Good for non-technical role screening.

Best for:All role types, not just technical
Cost saving:25–40% reduction in unsuitable candidates advancing
Visit TestGorilla

Karat

From $400/interview

4.6

Outsources technical interviews entirely to expert interviewers. Eliminates engineering team time cost entirely for first technical screens. High quality, consistent signal.

Best for:Senior technical interviews at scale
Cost saving:Full replacement of internal technical screens
Visit Karat

Interview Intelligence & AI

Transcription, summarisation, and AI coaching tools that reduce post-interview documentation time from 30 minutes to under 5 minutes per interview.

Metaview

From $12/user/mo

4.7

AI transcription and summarisation built specifically for interviews. Integrates with video platforms and ATS. GDPR compliant, candidate-consent focused.

Best for:Interview note-taking automation
Cost saving:15–25 minutes saved per interview
Visit Metaview

Otter.ai

From $8.33/mo

4.3

Not recruiting-specific but widely used for interview transcription. Lower cost, good accuracy, simple setup. Lacks ATS integration of dedicated tools.

Best for:General transcription for small teams
Cost saving:10–20 minutes saved per interview
Visit Otter.ai

Screenloop

Custom pricing

4.5

Records, transcribes, and analyses interviews for bias and quality. Provides hiring manager coaching and structured debrief support.

Best for:Interview quality analytics
Cost saving:Improves interviewer efficiency over time
Visit Screenloop

Recommended Tech Stack by Company Size

Startup (under 50 employees)

Budget: Under $500/mo

  • Workable (ATS)
  • Calendly (scheduling)
  • TestGorilla (assessments)
  • Metaview (notes)

Save $150–$300/hire vs manual

Growth (50–500 employees)

Budget: $500–$2,000/mo

  • Ashby or Lever (ATS)
  • GoodTime (scheduling)
  • Spark Hire (async video)
  • Codility or HackerRank (tech)

Save $400–$800/hire

Enterprise (500+ employees)

Budget: $2,000+/mo

  • Greenhouse or Workday (ATS)
  • GoodTime or Prelude (scheduling)
  • HireVue (video + AI)
  • Karat (technical interviews)

Save $600–$1,500/hire

All Cost Reduction Strategies

15 proven ways to cut hiring spend

Calculate Your Current Costs

See where you can save most