Applicant tracking system (ATS) pricing in 2026.
Some ATS publish self-service prices; the enterprise majors are quote-only. Here is the verified, dated breakdown for the vendors that publish, the realistic landscape for those that do not, and the two pricing models that actually decide your bill.
The short answer
ATS pricing splits in two. Vendors that publish self-service pricing run roughly $1,000 to $9,000 a year for small-to-mid teams: Breezy HR from free up to $529/mo, JazzHR $1,000 to $5,508/yr, Workable $299 to $719/mo (by employee headcount), Ashby Foundations $400/mo (up to 100 employees). Quote-only majors (Greenhouse, Lever) publish no price and negotiate annual contracts, usually five figures a year at mid-market and up. The pricing model, per headcount, flat tier, or per seat, matters more than the headline. As of June 2026, verified against each vendor’s published pricing page.
The two pricing models that decide your bill.
Before comparing headline numbers, understand the model. The same company can pay wildly different amounts depending on whether the ATS bills by employee headcount, by flat plan tier, or by negotiated seats. This is the single most important thing to get right when budgeting.
Workable and Ashby price by total company headcount. Your bill rises as the company grows even if your recruiting team does not. Crossing a tier boundary (e.g. 20 to 21 employees) can jump the price. Punishes large companies that hire slowly.
JazzHR and Breezy charge a flat price per plan with unlimited users. Team size does not change the cost; the plan’s feature set does. Rewards small teams that hire heavily and large hiring teams on a fixed budget.
Greenhouse and Lever publish no price and structure annual contracts around seats, active requisitions, and modules. Flexible but opaque: the only way to know your cost is a sales conversation, and quotes vary by quarter and discovery call.
ATS that publish self-service pricing (2026).
These four vendors list prices publicly, so you can budget without a sales call. Every figure here is verified against the vendor’s own pricing page as of June 2026.
| Vendor | Entry plan | Top published plan | Pricing model |
|---|---|---|---|
| Breezy HR | Free (1 position) | Business $529/mo ($439/mo annual) | Flat tier, unlimited users |
| JazzHR | Hero $1,000/yr | Pro $5,508/yr | Flat tier |
| Workable | Standard $299/mo | Enterprise $719/mo | By employee headcount |
| Ashby | Foundations $400/mo (to 100 employees) | Plus / Enterprise (custom) | By employee headcount |
Breezy HR publishes the most accessible ladder: Bootstrap free (1 active position, unlimited users and candidates), Startup $189/mo ($157/mo billed annually), Growth $329/mo ($273/mo annual), Business $529/mo ($439/mo annual), Custom Pro by quote. Annual billing includes two months free, and pricing is per plan tier, not per seat.
JazzHR is flat-rate and small-business-focused: Hero $1,000/yr, Plus $3,480/yr, Pro $5,508/yr billed annually, with up to 24 percent saved by paying yearly. Workable bills by employee headcount with unlimited active jobs: Standard $299/mo, Premier $599/mo, Enterprise $719/mo, 20 percent off annual. On Standard, video interviews, texting, assessments, and performance reviews are $39 to $109/mo add-ons each, so the real Standard cost is often above the $299 headline. Ashby publishes only its Foundations tier ($400/mo for up to 100 employees, 10 percent off annual); Plus (101 to 1,000 employees) and Enterprise (1,000+) are custom-quoted.
The quote-only majors: Greenhouse and Lever.
The two best-known enterprise ATS publish no list pricing. Both are sold as annual contracts structured around seat count, active requisitions, and module selection, and both negotiate. The honest statement about their cost is that it is bespoke.
Greenhouse is quote-only. Third-party procurement aggregators put the starting point in the mid four figures to around $6,500/yr and a roughly 200-employee company in the mid-teens of thousands per year, but those are aggregates of negotiated deals, not list prices; your quote depends on size, modules, and timing. Lever is similarly opaque, with annual commitments built from customised bundles and no public number. For either, budget a five-figure annual line at mid-market and plan for separate implementation and integration fees on top.
What the headline price leaves out.
The plan price is rarely the whole bill. Three costs sit outside the headline on most mid-market and enterprise ATS deployments, and they routinely add 20 to 60 percent to year-one spend.
- →Add-on modules. Texting, video interviewing, assessments, advanced reporting, and AI features are frequently priced separately. Workable charges $39 to $109/mo each for these on its Standard tier.
- →Implementation and migration. Mid-market and enterprise ATS take 60 to 120 days to configure, and data migration plus integration with your HRIS, calendar, and background-check vendor often involves paid professional services.
- →Tier-boundary jumps. On headcount-priced ATS, a single new hire can push you across a pricing band. Budget for the band above your current headcount, not the one you sit in today.
Where the ATS sits in cost-per-hire.
The ATS is the largest single line in most recruiting tool stacks, but amortised across a year of hiring it is rarely the dominant cost-per-hire driver; interviewer time and agency fees are. A $5,000/yr ATS across 50 hires is $100 per hire; a $40,000 enterprise ATS across 300 hires is about $133 per hire. Both are small next to the loaded interviewer hours a single onsite loop consumes. Size the ATS to your real hiring volume and team shape, then put the saved budget where the per-hire cost actually concentrates.
For the full picture of where tooling fits against interviewer time, recruiter fees, and the rest of the five-component model, see the cost-per-hire breakdown and run your own numbers in the calculator.
Cross-references.
For the broader recruiting-tooling category guide (sourcing, scheduling, async video), see the tooling cost page. For the assessment and live-coding platforms that integrate with your ATS, see the HackerRank, CodeSignal, and CoderPad cost pages.
Add your ATS cost amortised per hire to the five-component calculator scenario.
Frequently asked questions
How much does an applicant tracking system cost in 2026?
Which ATS publish their pricing and which are quote-only?
Is ATS pricing per recruiter seat, per employee, or flat?
What does Workable cost and how is it priced?
What does Greenhouse cost?
What is the cheapest credible ATS?
Related reading
The full recruiting-stack category guide.
Read →Assessment platform that integrates with your ATS.
Read →Credit-based assessment and interview platform.
Read →Where agency and RPO cost sits versus tooling.
Read →Where the ATS line fits in the full model.
Read →See your per-hire cost in dollars.
Read →